Judgement of the Day-ASHOK ARORA V SCBA

CASE LAW


ASHOK ARORA V SCBA


(WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) DIARY NUMBER 11453 /2020(


FACTS

In this case Arora removed from his position by the SCBA and this case Arora argued that

according to Rule 35 the power to suspend or expel a member rested with the general horse of

SCBA and there Is a misconduct carried out by the committee and violated his natural justice.

SCBA argued that as per rules 35 only delete with the issue of removal of a member. And Area

called (EGM) emergent general meeting for the removal of the senior advocate Dushyant Dave

and as Supreme Court as per the Rules Area misbehaves and I'm the executive Committee all

natural justice principles followed.


DELHI HC OBSERVATION

Since at this stage the court is only required to take a prima facie view this court finds that the

plaintiff has not made out any prima facie case in his favor for grant of injection as prayed for

court noted Rule 35 had no application reheard to suppression /position of a member of SCBA

as an officers bearer of its association there was no prima facie case in favor of Arora.

And BCI subsequently stayed the Resolution passed by the EC executive Council of SCBA and

for which Advocate Ashok Arora suspended.


JUDGEMENT

Delhi High court on 6th October passed the interim order in the suit preferred by Ashok Arora

against his ouster. And referred to stay the removal of Ashok Arora from the post of sectary

(SCBA)

Recent Posts

See All

©2020 by LAWBHARAT. Proudly created with Wix.com