ASHOK ARORA V SCBA
(WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) DIARY NUMBER 11453 /2020(
In this case Arora removed from his position by the SCBA and this case Arora argued that
according to Rule 35 the power to suspend or expel a member rested with the general horse of
SCBA and there Is a misconduct carried out by the committee and violated his natural justice.
SCBA argued that as per rules 35 only delete with the issue of removal of a member. And Area
called (EGM) emergent general meeting for the removal of the senior advocate Dushyant Dave
and as Supreme Court as per the Rules Area misbehaves and I'm the executive Committee all
natural justice principles followed.
DELHI HC OBSERVATION
Since at this stage the court is only required to take a prima facie view this court finds that the
plaintiff has not made out any prima facie case in his favor for grant of injection as prayed for
court noted Rule 35 had no application reheard to suppression /position of a member of SCBA
as an officers bearer of its association there was no prima facie case in favor of Arora.
And BCI subsequently stayed the Resolution passed by the EC executive Council of SCBA and
for which Advocate Ashok Arora suspended.
Delhi High court on 6th October passed the interim order in the suit preferred by Ashok Arora
against his ouster. And referred to stay the removal of Ashok Arora from the post of sectary